The FDA’s Mitch Zeller & Dr. Scott Gottlieb have been published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“A Nicotine-Focused Framework for Public Health”
“The agency’s new tobacco strategy has two primary parts: reducing the addictiveness of combustible cigarettes while recognizing and clarifying the role that potentially less harmful tobacco products could play in improving public health. We must also work toward a greater role for medicinal nicotine and other therapeutic products in helping smokers to quit and remain nonsmokers.”
While I am completely opposed to the framing of the nicotine addiction theory without tobacco, there were two other parts I’m not convinced quite yet that we’re on the right path; bold is my emphasis:
- “reducing the addictiveness of combustible cigarettes”
- “We must also work toward a greater role for medicinal nicotine and other therapeutic products in helping smokers to quit and remain nonsmokers.”
- The focus on “nicotine” is, in my eyes, a subliminal way to keep the definition of e-liquid as tobacco, manipulate e-cigarette products as tobacco, and collect unjust & undue tax – on a product that is not addictive without tobacco, and not tobacco.
- The teetering on medicinal nicotine & other therapeutic products gives a direct odor of pharmaceutical product and control, something they’ve already had and failed miserably with.
I predicted this In March of 2016:
This from UCSF in 2015
Clive Bates & Carrie Wade:
That article is here:
Brad Rodu on Nicotine reduction:
Brad Rodu on tar, not nicotine:
Always a great read:
On a positive note
The publication states:
Nicotine, though not benign, is not directly responsible for the tobacco-caused cancer, lung disease, and heart disease that kill hundreds of thousands of Americans each year.
Excellent….and goes on to add
…within a landscape including other, noncombustible products such as e-cigarettes, represents a promising foundation for a comprehensive approach to tobacco harm reduction. In working toward this vision, the FDA is committed to striking an appropriate balance between protecting the public and fostering innovation in less harmful nicotine delivery.
That’s the first positive thing I’ve heard in some time from the government:
Tobacco Harm Reduction.
Are there other chemicals that cause addiction in tobacco?
In the meantime, I’ll tweet (and blog) with one eye open.
Here’s the article in full:
A rehash of the same rhetoric in the JAMA:
You can find me here trying to be cordial on Facebook
You can find me here being a bit more evil on Twitter
You can also find me on LinkedIn
Have you met my friends at vapers.org.uk?
Medical, Research, Science Professionals:
A Billion Lives
Your comments are NEVER filtered, always encouraged and welcome on this blog.
There is definitely more to come.
Keep ON #Vaping On.