This will be brief. This article by Paul Blair brings to light an opinion. A very valid and reasonable opinion. Common sense, in fact, to what I and we as vapers believe and have said all along.
The scheme of children, safety, chemicals and drivel to conjure up support by Mr. & Mrs. Never Smoker to vote / get in ANY type of tax increase by creating the illusion of dangers of e-cigarettes.
It’s Taxing Thoughts, A Ponzi Scheme for THEM and we’re the scapegoat.
Now, not everyone plays nice. Tactics are direct, swift and I don’t have media on my side, so I tried this a while back. It seems to be truer than I imagined looking back now.
I was trying to counter THEM. How far is too far? I hoped it would create a political stew in my mind. I wrote it like I imagined an internal memo would be written. I’ve written a few in past lives, none quite like this. I am fighting for vaping and smokers very lives, so I just typed it up:
I fooled a few on twitter & facebook with this:
There were secret emails asking where I got it, how I got it…. who I possibly knew…
I am not answering to anyone, I have no ties or conflict of interest.
I am also not in charge nor care of public health for the State of California.
My “PHLIE# memo…” is a sad attempt at satire at best.
What they are doing is CRIMINAL. To take the thought from anyone and convince them with both the #curbit AND the #stillblowingsmoke campaigns IS a criminal act up to and including detrimental health effects on the unknowing, and the ultimate price is death for those who continue to smoke.
These people consciously KNOW better, and are TRUSTED to care for PUBLIC health.
I came clean pretty quickly with my little memo, but what tactics ARE being used against vaping with every Government with money over health every time? Here’s a screen shot of a bit of the highlights from this article:
The wonderful people at M.O.V.E.
work very hard to fight this asinine drivel.
We as the “public” need to be able to hold them accountable.
HOW do we get TO them for covering up truth? I know – it’s “Plausible Deniability“.