For Immediate Release: Public Health Officials prefer you to smoke cigarettes and some are getting away with it.
Around the world, many Public Health Officials, including Doctors, are falsely continuing to claim “e-cigarettes”, also known as “vaping” as a dangerous method to stop smoking, despite the expected protocol to normally show proof.
Not one official has provided proper documented evidence to their claims of “dangerous”, despite the severity; a first to those in what is normally considered a highly prestigious position of authority with these types of claims.
Apparently, they are using their prestige inappropriately and would rather you smoke cigarettes than to even try an electronic cigarette. Their false claims, collusion, duplicity, hypocrisy and ineptitude, are confusing the masses, despite overwhelming scientific proof vaping is a better alternative to traditional cigarettes.
They are quickly losing respect from their counterparts around the world. These are just three quick examples of what they deny are clearly and easily able to be found:
1. Public Health officials falsely claim nicotine is both dangerous and addictive.According to the Tobacco Harm Reduction website that is not true: Link: Isn’t nicotine itself very bad for you? – No, it’s not.
2. Public Health Officials falsely claim “higher levels of formaldehyde than in cigarettes”. Tests were improperly performed at much higher levels: Link: The deception of measuring formaldehyde in e-cigarette aerosol: the difference between laboratory measurements and true exposure
Judy Judd, Project Director Tobacco Control Program, who shows no professional health credentials: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jmjudd proposes bans like tobacco and thinks vaping “reinforces social acceptance of smoking, and their emissions can contain carcinogens and toxic chemicals” (like claims above) and her position is that “research is in the early stages” which is simply not true. Plenty of studies have been done. Her statements clearly lead one to believe smoking is less dangerous. Counter-intuitive, but a very powerful statement from someone who works for a “tobacco control” program.
This creates confusion with the power of words like “toxic carcinogens”. Judy Judd – showing NO proof with her claims, and no credentials, just that she’s able to use a title as a “director”, not a scientist, has an OPINION here and is not putting health first as she claims in the opinion below:
3. Public Health Officials state “Gateway towards tobacco” like above:
Those claims are also properly dismissed: Link: American Journal Of Preventive Medicine:
It turns out NOT all Public Health cover things up, as you see from the studies & links above.
Some are taking responsibly and PUBLICLY embracing this, and there is a growing list of professionals called
M.O.V.E: (Medical Organizations Supporting Vaping & Electronic Cigarettes): M.O.V.E
If you are a health professional. I urge you to join as well, here’s a list of Professionals showing support of this life saving technology.
So where do we go from here? I believe we should go to war. We recognize quite clearly that this is a war with a determined enemy. The Public Health field has demonstrated in on every continent that is has forfeited any right to be regarded as anything other than the opposition, joining forces with financially motivated pharmaceutical, political and media interests reaching global proportions.
These merchants of tobacco death are deliberately suppressing information, hiding the truth from the public. They are adamantly claiming there is not enough research, when there is: The reader must ask what the motive is for deceiving or denying the clear information if vaping or “e-cigarettes” as they are called, would only serve to save millions of lives around the world, effectively wiping tobacco out of existence within a few short years. Wouldn’t that be the ultimate goal of “Public Health”?
Maybe they fear the name, e-cigarette. Even a “Simple Simon” knows these are not smoking devices, despite the original name. Some call them personal vaporizers. They only contain a few ingredients already approved by F.D.A. standards. Some even contain no nicotine, or the user can gradually step the nicotine level down at the user’s discretion, unlike cigarettes, well known to have over 4,000 dangerous and carcinogenic and toxic chemicals.
Professors of Public Health unprofessionally say these are dangerous, and deny all existence of overwhelming and conclusive scientific proof vaping is a safer alternative to quit smoking, despite the evidence.
Clive Bates, Former Director of Action on Smoking & Health (London) and founder of the NGO Framework Convention Alliance, set up to support the development of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control has this to say: E-cigarettes, vaping and public health http://www.clivebates.com/documents/vapebriefing.pdf
We as concerned citizens must confront them on every battlefield, whether it be health, political, social, environmental, economic or any other form of media imaginable to help the world understand the depth of their denial to potential loss of life by stopping cigarette smoking at any cost. If you are a Health Professional, I implore you to consider joining M.O.V.E. M.O.V.E: (Medical Organizations Supporting Vaping & Electronic Cigarettes): https://sciencecig.wordpress.com/move/
Please visit this highly informative website for more information. http://www.ecigalternative.com/ecigarette-studies-research.htm
The author would like to thank & recognize Mr. Chapman for his role in allowing some of the text in part, from his very own “manual of tactics”; “The Lung Goodbye” (July, 1983) found here: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/gjq72f00/pdf